Datafin

Data-driven stock analysis platform for global investors.

Sitemap
HomeScreenerValuationSector Analysis
Resources
LibraryDatafin GuideMetric MethodologyValuation MethodologiesFAQPricingWho Is Datafin?Communication
Legal
Privacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie PolicyKVKK NoticeRefund Policy
Data Sources

Financial data sourced from official regulatory filings and verified market data providers. Metrics calculated using GAAP/IFRS standards.

Disclaimer

The analyses and visuals on this site are for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.

Investment decisions involve risk. Verify data independently and consult a licensed advisor when needed.

© 2026 Datafin Financial Data Analysis Systems. All rights reserved.

Last updated: April 2026

F PEER ANALYSIS

Ford Motor Company — metric-by-metric comparison with peers and the industry median

FFord Motor Company

🇺🇸 USA · US · Consumer Cyclical · Auto Manufacturers

Value itDuel
PriceFinancialsPeers

Overall Profile & Returns

· Auto Manufacturers

Position Within Industry

0 = weak quartile, 100 = strong quartile
ValuationProfitabilityGrowthFinancial HealthDividend
FIndustry median

Scores normalize each metric against industry quartiles (p25–p75); direction is inverted for lower-is-better metrics.

Return Comparison

1-Year
Split-adjusted
F+22.9%MBG-3.0%VOW3-16.1%BMW-18.3%STLAP-41.4%PAH3-15.7%
Year-to-Date (YTD)
F+7.9%MBG-19.1%VOW3-27.1%BMW-31.7%STLAP-46.5%PAH3-28.9%
1-Year
Split-adjusted
F+22.9%GM+48.5%RIVN+54.1%
Year-to-Date (YTD)
F+7.9%GM-3.8%RIVN+2.2%

Key Metric Comparison

P/E

Lower is better
F—MBG8.87VOW36.02BMW5.34STLAP—PAH35.03Median 8.91

ROE

Higher is better
F-14.9%MBG5.2%VOW33.7%BMW7.1%STLAP-33.0%PAH37.8%Median 2.7%

Net Margin

Higher is better
F-3.2%MBG3.7%VOW32.1%BMW5.2%STLAP-14.5%PAH396.8%Median 1.3%

Revenue Growth

Higher is better
F3.8%MBG-8.6%VOW3-2.1%BMW-6.3%STLAP-2.1%PAH3—Median 7.1%

P/E

Lower is better
F—GM29.11RIVN—Median 8.91

ROE

Higher is better
F-14.9%GM4.0%RIVN-66.2%Median 2.7%

Net Margin

Higher is better
F-3.2%GM1.4%RIVN-63.6%Median 1.3%

Revenue Growth

Higher is better
F3.8%GM-2.0%RIVN10.4%Median 7.1%

All Metrics

Valuation
MetricFMBGVOW3BMWSTLAPPAH3Ind. Median
P/E—8.876.025.34—5.03●8.91
P/B1.500.460.21●0.370.270.231.07
EV/EBITDA251.649.595.95●6.85——13.13
P/S0.300.330.120.280.09●2.990.39
Financial Health
MetricFMBGVOW3BMWSTLAPPAH3Ind. Median
Current Ratio1.091.391.071.171.0215.30●1.23
Debt/Equity419.5%105.7%165.5%115.3%85.8%●—133.5%
NetDebt/EBITDA174.196.225.054.93-0.96●—2.72
Profitability
MetricFMBGVOW3BMWSTLAPPAH3Ind. Median
Net Margin-3.2%3.7%2.1%5.2%-14.5%96.8%●1.3%
ROE-14.9%5.2%3.7%7.1%-33.0%7.8%●2.7%
ROA-2.2%1.9%1.0%2.5%-11.1%6.5%●0.9%
EBITDA Margin0.4%9.8%13.1%14.5%-9.9%92.2%●4.7%
Growth + Dividend
MetricFMBGVOW3BMWSTLAPPAH3Ind. Median
Rev. Growth3.8%●-8.6%-2.1%-6.3%-2.1%—7.1%
NI Growth—-45.2%-31.9%3.4%●——-31.9%
Div. Yield4.4%7.8%7.2%7.3%13.4%●5.4%7.2%
Payout-39.3%84.8%67.3%38.8%-8.8%20.8%27.8%
Valuation
MetricFGMRIVNInd. Median
P/E—29.11—8.91
P/B1.501.14●5.711.07
EV/EBITDA251.6411.32●—13.13
P/S0.30●0.394.550.39
Financial Health
MetricFGMRIVNInd. Median
Current Ratio1.091.152.10●1.23
Debt/Equity419.5%203.9%149.4%●133.5%
NetDebt/EBITDA174.196.69-0.71●2.72
Profitability
MetricFGMRIVNInd. Median
Net Margin-3.2%1.4%●-63.6%1.3%
ROE-14.9%4.0%●-66.2%2.7%
ROA-2.2%0.9%●-23.7%0.9%
EBITDA Margin0.4%8.4%●-44.5%4.7%
Growth + Dividend
MetricFGMRIVNInd. Median
Rev. Growth3.8%-2.0%10.4%●7.1%
NI Growth—-56.3%—-31.9%
Div. Yield4.4%●0.8%—7.2%
Payout-39.3%27.8%—27.8%

The green dot marks the best value in the group given the metric direction (higher/lower is better). All metrics use trailing-twelve-month (TTM) data.

Go deeper on F

Run a DCF valuation

Full DCF model with editable assumptions

Start a head-to-head duel

Compare two stocks metric by metric

Filter in the stock screener

Build your own universe with 400+ metrics

Data on this page refreshes once per day. Price data as of Jul 6, 26. This content is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.