Loading data...
Loading data...
Compares relative valuation levels inside the Semiconductor Value Chain theme.
Relative valuation snapshots for comparable companies inside a theme.
For each company the median fair value across five models is read against the current price.
Each bubble is a theme: the horizontal axis is median P/E (cheapness), the vertical axis median Piotroski F-score (fundamental quality). Top-left is cheap and high quality, bottom-right is expensive and weak.
| Theme | Median P/E | Median Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|---|
| AI Platforms and Models | 33.8 | 6 |
| AI Chips and Accelerators | 65.4 | 5.5 |
| AI Data Center Infrastructure | 41.1 | 5 |
| AI Software Layer | 25.8 | 6 |
| Semiconductor Value Chain | 55.1 | 6 |
| Digital Infrastructure | 26.1 | 5 |
| Cybersecurity | 42.2 | 5 |
| Robotics and Automation | 44.7 | 5.5 |
| Defense and Sovereign Technology | 43.5 | 6 |
| Space and Satellite Economy | 23.5 | 6 |
| Strategic Minerals | 19.1 | 4 |
| Copper and Power Transmission | 31.7 | 5 |
| Battery and Energy Storage | 56.8 | 5 |
| Nuclear Fuel and Uranium | 17.7 | 4.5 |
| Clean Energy Equipment | 24.1 | 5 |
| Water Scarcity and Infrastructure | 27.2 | 5 |
| Next-Generation Healthcare | 29.7 | 6 |
| Pharmaceutical Manufacturers | 21.2 | 5 |
| Financial Rails and Payments | 25 | 6.5 |
| Digital Commerce and Marketplaces | 26.8 | 5.5 |
| Food Security | 16 | 5 |
| Agricultural Technology | 10.1 | 5 |
| Circular Economy and Waste | 37 | 6 |
“Coverage” is how many companies a model could value; “Agreement” is how close the model’s fair value sits to the blended median. Higher on both means a more dependable model.
Semiconductor multiples swing hard with the cycle; the goal here is to flag names that look cheap on durable earnings, not just peak ones.
Comparing multiples inside one theme is cleaner than across unrelated sectors, because every name here shares the same cyclical weather.
The multiple models (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) value each company at the theme peer-median multiple, so the fair value reflects cheap/expensive relative to peers.
The intrinsic models (Owner Earnings, FCF Yield) give an absolute reference based on cash and earnings power, independent of peers.
“Blended FV” is the median across these models; “Upside” is the gap to the current price.
Latest published or live-generated results from the official Datafin analysis.
| # | Stock | Price | P/E(peer median) | EV/EBITDA(peer median) | P/S(peer median) | Owner Earnings | FCF Yield | Blended FV | Upside | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇺🇸 | QCOM.US Qualcomm Incorporated | $128.78 | $384.47 | $308.74 | $516.93 | $75.52 | $116.62 | $308.74 | +139.7% |
| 2 | 🇺🇸 | INTC.US Intel Corporation | $44.13 | - | $74.07 | $131.75 | - | - | $102.91 | +133.2% |
| 3 | 🇺🇸 | MU.US Micron Technology Inc | $337.84 | $878.60 | $1,073.11 | $635.05 | $98.55 | $344.29 | $635.05 | +88% |
| 4 | 🇺🇸 | TXN.US Texas Instruments Incorporated | $194.14 | $243.89 | $242.10 | $251.28 | $31.01 | $40.71 | $242.10 | +24.7% |
| 5 | 🇺🇸 | LRCX.US Lam Research Corp | $213.66 | $221.60 | $208.79 | $214.80 | $41.45 | $51.31 | $208.79 | -2.3% |
| 6 | 🇳🇱 | ASML.AS ASML Holding N.V. | €1,119.20 | €1,078.06 | €1,111.33 | €1,088.12 | €194.49 | €232.20 | €1,078.06 | -3.7% |
| 7 | 🇺🇸 | KLAC.US KLA Corporation | $1,472.41 | $1,472.41 | $1,482.93 | $1,238.23 | $295.71 | $304.71 | $1,238.23 | -15.9% |
| 8 | 🇺🇸 | AMAT.US Applied Materials Inc | $454.89 | $442.27 | $326.93 | $452.48 | $71.17 | $74.66 | $326.93 | -28.1% |
| 9 | 🇺🇸 | ADI.US Analog Devices Inc | $419.94 | $280.60 | $404.75 | $323.57 | $80.47 | $93.08 | $280.60 | -33.2% |
| 10 | 🇺🇸 | AMD.US Advanced Micro Devices Inc | $203.43 | $125.66 | $139.11 | $282.75 | $34.65 | $51.96 | $125.66 | -38.2% |
| 11 | 🇺🇸 | NVDA.US NVIDIA Corporation | $214.86 | $271.80 | $264.39 | $129.46 | $53.39 | $48.82 | $129.46 | -39.7% |
| 12 | 🇺🇸 | AVGO.US Broadcom Inc | $309.51 | $212.19 | $235.45 | $174.01 | $56.18 | $59.15 | $174.01 | -43.8% |